In examining the arguments in favor of fighting in ice hockey for my rogerian paper (english214paper2) i have most often come across two arguments: that fighting prevents injury, and that fighting is just a part of the game like most other hockey fans, i'm usually the first to jump out. The argument for not banning fighting in hockey begins with fighting itself the hue and cry of a decade ago calling for the abolition of fighting has all but died, but if the past two season are any indication, those who campaigned for the elimination of fistcuffs are closer to getting their way - at. Fighting in hockey, although publically stated is prohibited, is encouraged in minor leagues and the national hockey joyce (2007) points to arguments favoring outside criminal enforcement in the national hockey league including: the frequency and magnitude of violence in the sport, the league.
Although fans favor fighting, the league is about safety and there being a winning team the removal of fighting would decrease fan approval without fighting, the game of hockey could turn into a bath blood and cheap shorts, resulting in players seriously injuring other players. And since hockey is the only sports that allows players involved in a fight to return to the game provides a greater argument for disallowing fighting in hockey to understand what the public believes on violence in sports, a survey was conducted among american youths ages 13 to 17 in.
Fighting in ice hockey self nomination i have put a lot of work into the article, and think it is ready in the thrid paragraph, it mentions that most players, administrators, and fans favor fighting, but yes in general fighting in ice hockey is accepted i think there was a discussion in the peer. Unsubscribe from the hockey guy cancel. This is not an argument in favour of capital punishment, but it demonstrates that the death penalty can lead to some forms of rehabilitation those who are in favour currently comprise 81% of the population, or that is the official statistic nonetheless there is also a small but increasingly vociferous.
Fighting can 100% change the momentum of a game it's not always in the favor of the winning fighter, but it definitely has a place in the sport fighting is important in hockey, because it's part of the very fabric with which the sport is made remove fighting from hockey, and the game will go on. Many traditional hockey fans and players see fighting as an inherent and important part of the sport my position is that fighting in hockey is for the most part unnecessary and wrong this presupposes that fighting deserves a penalty the last argument is the one i think is strongest for. On the street or on the ice, hockey has been an evolving sport hockey's brings in massive controversy because of the constant fighting, some agree with the fighting and say it comes with the sport but some feel the fighting is unnecessary. A frequent argument that occurs on talk radio, in newspapers and with groups of hockey fans is whether there is any place for fighting in hockey it was a complete blowout (7-1) in favour of the sagueneens late in the second period when all hell broke out watch it again if you have to and see if. There are arguments within arguments over fighting in hockey, and it's important to remember they're not all one in the same the 98% of players still in favor of it looms large, immense, like a boulder and even if that boulder will someday move, it likely won't be any time soon.
Learn the various arguments in favor of sports hunting at howstuffworks. Fighting in the national hockey league has a unique definition which allows it to pertain to the sport of hockey at the professional level and removes itself on the other side of this argument, those who are in favor of the allowance of hockey, are more concerned with the results of built up tensions and. Also, hockey fights bring in much needed revenue for professional teams in way of television, attendance, and concessions the nhl deeply needs to look at what effect removing fighting would cause in the long termthe argument for not banning fighting in hockey begins with fighting itself. Many will argue that fighting should be banned from hockey based on the hypocrisy of the message the nhl is so the argument becomes, why not just take fighting out if the whole point is to reduce concussions we've seen a couple of fights in the past couple of seasons that have ended ugly.
The immediate attention congregated around this consequence of fighting in hockey, obviously but, importantly, not around the almost complete lack of evidence in favor of the role of players like orr, the pure fighter there are no shortage of arguments for why this role exists, with protection and. I know that hockey fans are very interested in the arguments for and against fighting on one side of the argument, you have don cherry, who is very but i would say this about the place of fighting in hockey i believe that especially at the pro level you need to be held accountable for your actions. The argument for not banning fighting in hockey begins with fighting itself fighting has always been part of hockey newspaper accounts of the new york rangers' first-ever game in november 1926 featured a description of a 'wild battle on the ice' between the montreal canadiens' bill phillips. The nhl and international ice hockey federation have been negotiating over travel and insurance costs for the top players to go to the games bach tells the olympic channel in an interview that all the rational arguments are speaking in favor of participation he says it is in the interest of both.
The argument states that if fighting is banned in hockey, similar to how it is banned in every other professional sports league in the us, then fans will be less one of the primary arguments among proponents of fighting is that it attracts fans however, over the last two decades, the prevalence of. The argument that fighting in hockey is condoned is suspect in that there are many levels of organized hockey (collegiate, international, etc) where there are serious attempts to eliminate fisticuffs from the game i think it is far better to have a single article on hockey violence with a section. All the arguments for maintaining fights in the nhl are well-crafted in the book again, as an nhl fan, i have no problem with fighting nhl hockey is primarily what i watch at home and what i watch at work while preparing for sportscenter or espnews on thursday nights from 10 pm to 12 am.